Data Users Study

Previously, an inventory of available data, primary users, and systems (both paper and electronic) was lacking. This limited the ability of the GOM and Kuunika Project planners to assess gaps, bottlenecks, and hone in on people and processes where investments would yield the greatest benefit. Further, critical decision points for the HIV response and data needed to support these decisions had not been systematically documented. Cooper/Smith conducted a rapid study to fill this gap and use evidence to guide Kuunika planning.

We outlined a series of key questions for each primary objective and designed tools to capture this information.

We chose 16 health facilities representing 4 HIV high-burden districts with various characteristics (tiers) and historical data reporting performance. Sampling frame below.

We held structured interviews and focus groups in each of the 4 districts.

At each facility we interviewed both data handlers and decision makers. At the district level we focused on the health management team members. Focus groups collected information from community-based organizations. We also spoke with program managers at the zone and central levels. Ultimately, our sample covered most every relevant health cadre and program function.

Data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed.

A full description of the study methods, including examples of instruments and key findings can be found in this presentation. Data dashboards and tools to investigate these data are available on this site on the Explore Data page.